Crocker
F
95% — 10.5 of 11 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 89% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases sat on (every role)
- Rosborough v. Shasta River Canal Co.
- Simonton v. El Dorado County
- Houston v. McKenna
- Conlin v. Seamen
- Real Del Monte Consolidated G. & S. M. Co. v. Thompson
- Jenkins v. California Stage Co.
- Griffith v. Cave
- Gordon v. Clark
- Wyman v. Banvard
- Melcher v. Kuhland
- Cowell v. Washburn
- Stanwood v. Sage
- Moore v. Tice
- Johns v. Trick
- Moulin v. Columbet
- Borland v. O'Neal
- Colton v. Seavey
- Weil v. Paul
- Kittle v. Pfeiffer
- Hilborn v. Alford
- Gallup v. Armstrong
- Johnson v. Wide West Mining Co.
- Uridias v. Morrill
- Keller v. Sutrick
- Gluckauf v. Reed