Crary
A-
100% — 33.0 of 33 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 12% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Lesser Towers, Inc. v. Roscoe-Ajax Construction Co.
- In re Gillett
- Malat v. Riddell
- In re Petition for Naturalization of Lapenieks
- Citrus Motors Ontario, Inc. v. United States
- United States v. Dalitz
- Braaksma v. Celebrezze
- In Re Chappel
- Meyer v. United States
- Lugash v. Santa Anita Manufacturing Corp.
- Godfrey v. United States
- Boeing Co. v. Nelson Name Plate Co.
- Morrison v. Sovereign State of California
- Wells v. State of California
- Tool Research & Engineering Corp. v. Honcor Corp.
- United States v. Travis
- United States v. Southern California Edison Co.
- Radisich v. Westfal Larsen & Co.
- Duplex Straw Dispenser Co. v. Harold Leonard & Company
- Diaz v. Chatterton
- United States v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.
- United States v. Travis
- Ronson Corp. v. Maruman of California, Inc.
- Max Factor & Co. v. Factor
- Glucksman v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.