Craig G. Riemer
Judge, Superior Court of California, County of Riverside 2003–
F+
46% — 6 of 13 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 88% of 312 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
21cases reviewed on appeal
26%reversed, in whole or part, of 19 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 14 reversed 4 dismissed 2 reversed in part 1
Areas
By year: 2025 6 · 2016 5 · 2015 3 · 2024 2 · 2014 2 · 2023 1 · 2022 1 · 2020 1 ·
Analysis
13reviewed cases analysed
44rulings read
0rulings where the model disagrees with the court
0cases with a verified missed authority
0appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- Stewart v. Universal Health Services of Rancho Springs CA4/1
- Scott v. County of Riverside
- Scott v. County of Riverside
- Residents Assn. of Greater Lake Mathews v. County of Riverside CA4/1
- Carmichael v. Cafe Sevilla of Riverside, Inc.
- Carmichael v. Cafe Sevilla of Riverside CA4/3
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. Powell CA4/2
- Marquez v. The Payment Consultants CA4/1
- Reynante v. Home Depot U.S.A. CA4/1
- Granado v. Faqih CA4/2
- Herpel v. County of Riverside
- Hernandez v. Ross Stores, Inc.
- People v. Lucero CA4/2
- Ghazal v. Wiederkehr CA4/1
- Delgado v. Campbell CA4/1
- Lepe v. F.M. Tarbell Co. CA4/2
- Castle Eurasia Corp. v. Federal Home Loans Corp. CA4/2
- Coppinger v. Rawlins
- Smith v. City of Riverside CA4/2
- People v. Uribe CA4/2
- Linda Vista Park, LLC v. Linda Vista, LLC CA4/3