gno.law

Cosgrave

District judge · 1930–1940

F-
91% — 56.5 of 62 orders sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 95% of 51 graded judges

On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.

63opinions authored
64panels sat on (not as author)

Analysis

No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.

Cases

  1. Pacific S. S. Co. v. Pillsbury · 1931-06-26 · civil
  2. In re Guaranty Building & Loan Ass'n No. 15807 · 1931-04-15 · probate
  3. Electrical Products Corp. v. Neale, Inc. · 1931-04-03 · civil
  4. United States v. Crank No. 9749 · 1931-03-20 · civil
  5. Keszthelyi v. Doheny Stone Drill Co. · 1931-02-23 · civil
  6. Helbush v. Helbush · 1931-01-27 · civil
  7. In Re Weeks Poultry Community, Inc. 14220-H · 1931-01-10 · other
  8. Witwer v. Harold Lloyd Corporation · 1930-11-18 · civil
  9. Maddux v. Grey · 1930-09-05 · civil
  10. In re Hupp No. 12771-J · 1930-08-26 · probate
  11. In re Petrich No. 5628-T · 1930-08-18 · probate
  12. Pacific Dock & Terminal Co. v. Los Angeles Dock & Terminal Co. No. M-46-H · 1930-07-08 · civil
  13. In Re Clinton 13410 · 1930-06-16 · probate
  14. Ex parte Bunji Une No. 368-J · 1930-05-29 · other