Chad W. Firetag
Judge, Superior Court of California, County of Riverside 2015–
C--
62% — 8 of 13 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 58% of 312 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
44cases reviewed on appeal
33%reversed, in whole or part, of 39 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 25 reversed 9 reversed in part 4 dismissed 3 writ denied 1 other 1 modified 1
Areas
By year: 2025 9 · 2021 9 · 2024 8 · 2023 6 · 2026 4 · 2022 4 · 2020 4 ·
Analysis
17reviewed cases analysed
48rulings read
0rulings where the model disagrees with the court
4cases with a verified missed authority
0appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- Sujan v. UHS Corona
- Kyles v. Vista Pacifica Enterprises CA4/1
- Masloub v. Masloub CA4/1
- Humble Fitness Beaumont v. Bedazzling Beaumont CA4/3
- Ramirez v. City of Indio CA4/1
- Ramirez v. City of Indio CA4/1
- Duong v. Uffer CA4/3
- People v. Velador
- Lucas v. The Law Offices of Nathan Mubasher CA4/2
- Preferred Hospitality v. Houston Casualty Co. CA4/2
- Said v. Cedars-Sinai Medical Group CA4/2
- Exteres Corp. v. The Connections Group CA4/2
- Joseph v. Cal. Dept. of Corrections CA4/2
- Bowser v. Ford Motor Company
- Resendez v. Bayview Loan Servicing CA4/2
- Protect Our Neighborhoods v. City of Palm Springs
- Joseph v. Cal. Dept. of Corrections CA4/2
- Clohecy v. Robertson CA4/2
- Mattson v. Feeding America Riverside San Bernardino Counties CA4/2
- Valbuena v. Ocwen Loan Servicing CA4/2
- Norris v. Lennar Homes of Cal. CA4/2
- City of Norco v. Mugar
- People v. Jennings CA4/2
- Moreno v. Munoz CA4/2
- Theriault v. Cal. State Personnel Board CA4/2