Carr
A-
provisional — 100% — 6.0 of 6 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 6 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Pugh v. City of Sacramento
- Parker v. State Personnel Board
- Krieger v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
- Bossi v. State of California
- Herbert v. Superior Court
- People v. Savala
- In Re Marriage of Lopez
- People v. Mercer
- Nielsen Freight Lines v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
- County of Placer v. Corin
- Hudson Oil Co. v. Shortstop
- Kunzler v. Karde
- O'Neal v. Jeremy C.
- People v. Hubbell
- People v. Hubbell
- People v. Tolliver
- Public Employees' Retirement System v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
- State of California v. Superior Court
- Silver v. Jordan
- Warren v. Flying Tiger Line, Inc.
- United States v. Von's Grocery Company
- United States v. General Motors Corporation
- Keys v. Dunbar
- Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. Harris Petroleum Co.
- Monroe Auto Equipment Co. v. Superior Industries, Inc.