Burns
A-
100% — 45.0 of 45 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 12% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Perez v. It Works Marketing CA1/5
- Clement v. Jaworski CA1/5
- T.M. v. Super. Ct.
- Anoke v. Twitter CA1/5
- Lara v. Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream CA1/5
- People v. Roberts CA1/5
- P.v. Lopez CA1/5
- People v. Smith CA1/5
- People v. Wallace CA1/5
- People v. Moore
- In re Angelica B. CA1/5
- People v. Mabon CA1/5
- Williams v. Love CA1/5
- People v. Byrd CA1/5
- People v. Quinnine CA1/5
- Estate of Ambrose-Gordon CA1/5
- Foroughi v. Creighton CA1/5
- People v. Mabon CA1/5
- People v. Sands CA1/5
- In re L.V. CA1/5
- People v. Bankers Insurance Company CA1/5
- Mueller v. Mueller
- People v. Koontzy
- Marriage of Ross and Crow CA1/5
- People v. West CA1/5