Burns
A-
100% — 45.0 of 45 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 12% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- N.C. v. E.K. CA1/5
- Szabo v. Protacio CA1/5
- Shoker v. Ghuman CA1/5
- Enriquez v. Sholokhova CA1/5
- Daley v. The Regents of the U. of Cal. CA1/5
- People v. Tregaskis CA1/5
- People v. Brennen CA1/5
- Sholokhova v. Enriquez CA1/5
- Sunflower Alliance v. Cal. Dept. of Conservation
- People v. Tregaskis CA1/5
- Daley v. The Regents of the U. of Cal. CA1/5
- People v. Saddozai CA1/5
- Parenti v. Broadmoor Police Protection District CA1/5
- Montezpalos v. Star Rooter and Plumbing CA1/5
- Anoke v. Twitter
- People v. Hayter CA1/5
- People v. Wilson CA1/5
- Conservatorship of Sandra L. CA1/5
- People v. Saddozai CA1/5
- Sunflower Alliance v. Cal. Dept. of Conservation
- People v. Sotelo-Moreno CA1/5
- Estate of Leon CA1/5
- People v. Jansen CA1/5
- People v. Luna CA1/5
- People v. Daffeh