Burns
A-
100% — 45.0 of 45 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 12% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Marriage of Haynes CA1/5
- Marriage of Haynes CA1/5
- In re S.P. CA1/5
- People v. Sands CA1/5
- In re N.V. CA1/5
- In re Jaydan G. CA1/5
- People v. Manuel CA1/5
- People v. Alston
- Song v. Jennings CA1/5
- Marriage of Kilpatrick and Hunt CA1/5
- Yeh v. Twitter CA1/5
- Spilman v. The Salvation Army
- People v. Magallon CA1/5
- Wise v. Tesla Motors, Inc.
- Make UC a Good Neighbor v. Regents of University of Cal.
- Daniel D. v. Zoya K. CA1/4
- People v. Velasquez-Gomez CA1/5
- People v. Wilson CA1/5
- Hand v. Superior Court CA1/5
- Blum v. Markusic CA1/5
- Dobarro v. Kim
- People v. Rossberg CA1/5
- People v. Tatum CA1/5
- People v. Nunn CA1/5
- People v. Kelley CA1/5