Burns
A-
100% — 45.0 of 45 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 12% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- United States v. Princeton Jamaal Perry
- United States v. Jeffrey Buchanan
- United States v. Kyle Everhart
- Shirrod v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
- United States v. Avalos
- Gregory Modar v. Maritime Services Corp
- United States v. Ramirez-Ortiz
- Corey Pritchett v. Steve Franke
- United States v. Ramon Garcia-Yepez
- Shirrod v. Pacific Rim Environmental Resources, LLC
- Potter v. Chex Systems, Inc.
- United States v. Martinez
- Welk v. Beam Suntory Import Co.
- United States v. Gonzalez
- Gregory Bos v. Board of Trustees
- Double Bogey Lp v. Sylvester Enea
- United States v. Gonzalez-Rodriguez
- Leticia Romero v. County of Washoe
- De Fernandez v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
- Manchouck v. Mondelez International, Inc.
- United States v. Cazarez-Santos
- Molina v. Pacer Cartage, Inc.
- Van Patten v. Vertical Fitness Group, LLC
- Jafari v. Federal Deposit Insurance ex rel. La Jolla Bank
- Candor v. United States