Burns
A-
100% — 45.0 of 45 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 12% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- People v. Garnsey CA1/5
- Spaghettini v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. CA1/5
- People v. Washington CA1/5
- Breja v. Breja CA1/5
- Schmid v. Two Rock Volunteer Fire Dept. CA1/5
- People v. Hill CA1/5
- People v. White CA1/5
- People v. Richards CA1/5
- Valdez v. Valdez CA1/5
- In re C.G. CA1/5
- People v. Souter CA1/5
- People v. Fimbres CA1/5
- Make UC a Good Neighbor v. The Regents of the University of Cal.
- People v. Washington CA1/5
- Make UC a Good Neighbor v. Regents of University of Cal.
- People v. Valtierra CA1/5
- FC Pier 70 v. City and County of San Francisco CA1/5
- Jiang v. Tseng CA1/5
- S.S. v. Superior Court CA1/5
- In re Layla R. CA1/5
- People v. Terp CA1/5
- Sierra Pacific Properties v. Otis Elevator CA1/5
- Banga v. The Regents of the U. of Cal. CA1/5
- State Dept. of State Hospitals v. Super. Ct.
- In re J.S. CA1/5