Burns
A-
100% — 45.0 of 45 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 12% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Tsang v. Engelberg CA1/5
- People v. Coleman
- People v. Jones CA1/5
- People v. Langi CA1/5
- People v. Triana CA1/5
- People v. Randhawa CA1/5
- In re Emily R. CA1/5
- People v. Webb CA1/5
- Martin v. Martin CA1/5
- Schoenmann v. Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe CA1/5
- Fok v. Binkoff CA1/5
- People v. Austin CA1/5
- Marriage of Gethin CA1/5
- Rodriguez v. Wong CA1/5
- People v. Jackson CA1/5
- Robertson v. Robertson CA1/5
- People v. Taylor CA1/5
- Mattson Technology, Inc. v. Applied Materials, Inc.
- Hernandez v. San Francisco Conservatory of Music CA1/5
- People v. Haynes CA1/5
- People v. Leonard CA1/5
- People v. Lee CA1/5
- People v. Morales CA1/5
- City of Benicia v. Diavitas CA1/5
- People v. Montgomery-Sansome CA1/5