Buchanan
D+
98% — 360.0 of 368 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 65% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Dopp v. Now Optics CA4/1
- Lerma v. Cottrell CA4/1
- Lorch v. Super. Ct.
- People v. Ontiveros CA4/1
- People v. Hoang CA4/1
- Narvaez v. Blue Wave Real Estate CA4/1
- People v. Stolte CA4/1
- People v. Lovejoy
- People v. Flores
- Deen v. Deen CA4/1
- People v. Bermingham CA4/1
- People v. Stuhler CA4/1
- People v. Mendoza CA4/1
- People v. Hernandez CA4/1
- People v. K.W. CA4/1
- People v. Tate CA4/1
- People v. Adam CA4/1
- Marriage of Bergman CA4/1
- People v. Elie CA4/1
- County of San Diego v. D.L. CA4/1
- People v. Salih CA4/1
- People v. Sirypangno CA4/1
- Rigg v. Childers CA4/1
- Maldonado v. County of Riverside CA4/1
- Davis v. Nissan North America, Inc.