gno.law

Brewster

Justice, Court of Appeal · 1985–2012

C--
98% — 102.0 of 104 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 57% of 80 graded judges

On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.

1cases reviewed on appeal
109opinions authored
126panels sat on (not as author)

Areas

civil 1

By year: 1996 1 ·

Analysis

No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.

Cases

  1. Kent Davis v. County of San Bernardino 10-55043 · 2011-07-11 · civil · affirmed
  2. Anne Waisgerber v. City of Los Angeles 09-56131 · 2010-12-15 · civil · reversed in part
  3. Donna Lee v. Debra Jacquez 08-55919 · 2010-12-15 · civil · reversed in part
  4. United States v. Farid Shalabi 10-50035 · 2010-12-10 · civil · affirmed
  5. United States v. Vinh Hoang Tran 09-50668 · 2010-12-10 · civil · affirmed
  6. Livebythepark Palm Springs, LP v. Arch Specialty Insurance Co. 09-56296 · 2010-12-09 · civil · reversed
  7. Anticancer Inc. v. Xenogen Corp. Civil No. 05-CV-0448-B(AJB) · 2007-08-13 · civil
  8. Lucent Technologies Inc. v. Gateway, Inc. Civil 02CV2060-B(CAB), 03CV0699-B (CAB), 03CV1108-B (CAB) · 2007-01-12 · civil
  9. LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC. v. Gateway, Inc. Civil 02CV2060-B(CAB), 03CV0699-B (CAB), 03CV1108-B (CAB) · 2007-01-12 · civil
  10. Lucent Technologies Inc. v. Gateway, Inc. Civil 02CV2060-B(CAB), 03CV0699-B (CAB), 03CV1108-B (CAB) · 2007-01-12 · civil
  11. Southwest Center for Biological Diversity v. Bartel No. 98-CV-2234-B(JMA) · 2006-12-15 · civil
  12. Qwest Communications Corp. v. Weisz CIV. 03CV0465B(LAB) · 2003-08-06 · civil
  13. DaimlerChrysler AG v. Feuling Advanced Technologies, Inc. CIV.00 CV 1541-B (NLS) · 2003-07-25 · civil
  14. American Sand Ass'n v. United States Department of the Interior 02CV1072-B (POR) · 2003-06-18 · civil
  15. INJEN TECHNOLOGY CO. LTD. v. Advanced Engine Management, Inc. Civ. 02 CV 2535-B (JFS) · 2003-04-29 · civil
  16. Citizens for Honesty & Integrity in Regional Planning v. County of San Diego Civ. 02 CV 1855 B(RBB) · 2003-04-15 · civil
  17. Ministry of Defense & Support for the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran v. Cubic Defense Systems, Inc. CIV. 98CV1165(RMB) · 2002-11-26 · civil
  18. Nichols Institute Diagnostics, Inc. v. Scantibodies Clinical Laboratory, Inc. CIV. 02CV0046-B (LAB) · 2002-09-11 · civil
  19. Saes Getters S.P.A. v. Aeronex, Inc. CIV.02CV612-B LSP · 2002-08-15 · civil
  20. Martin v. City of Oceanside Civ. 00CV1932BNLS · 2002-06-07 · civil
  21. Upper Deck Co., LLC. v. Federal Ins. Co. CIV. 01CV1413-B(CGA) · 2002-05-21 · civil
  22. Cox Communications PCS, L.P. v. City of San Marcos Civ. 01CV2304-B(AJB) · 2002-04-18 · civil
  23. Cox Communications PCS, L.P. v. City of San Marcos Civ. 01CV2304-B (AJB) · 2002-04-18 · civil
  24. GTE Wireless, Inc. v. Qualcomm, Inc. CIV. 99CV2173-B(CGA) · 2002-02-14 · civil
  25. Rodriquez v. Topps Co., Inc. 98CV2121-B (AJB) · 2000-06-21 · civil