Bernard G. Skomal
, District Court, S.D. California 2010–
D--
98% — 154.0 of 157 orders sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 79% of 51 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 6 reversed in part 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Sexton v. Mitratech Holdings, Inc.
- Lewis v. CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
- Purpura v. Does Members of the Inmate Classification Committee
- Lewis v. CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC
- Frontline Services, Inc. v. Seaspine Orthopedics Corporation
- Sanchez-Rivera v. United States
- Castro v. United States
- J.A.M. v. United States of America
- F & B Associates, Inc. v. McKnight
- BAE Systems San Diego Ship Repair Inc. v. United States
- Jones v. Pollard
- Finjan LLC v. ESET, LLC
- Younes v. Saul
- Sanchez-Rivera v. United States
- Nia v. Bank of America, N.A.
- Sywula v. DaCosta
- Baird v. Leidos, Inc.
- Lewis v. CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC
- Schultz v. Saul
- Al Ghalayini v. Kijakazi
- Baird v. Leidos, Inc.
- Toscano v. Ramos
- Nia v. Bank of America, N.A.
- Jones v. Pollard