gno.law

Bencivengo

Justice, Court of Appeal · 2011–2025

A-
provisional — 100% — 7.0 of 7 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 7 so far

On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.

2cases reviewed on appeal
8opinions authored
46panels sat on (not as author)
—2 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10

Outcomes on appeal

affirmed 2

The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets

reversed 2 affirmed 1

Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.

Areas

criminal 1 civil 1

By year: 2025 2 ·

Analysis

No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.

Cases reviewed on appeal (every role)

  1. United States v. Don'tmix 24-2687 · 2025-04-11 · criminal · affirmed
  2. Smith v. City of Medford 23-4213 · 2025-04-10 · civil · affirmed