Bencivengo
A-
provisional — 100% — 7.0 of 7 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 7 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
2cases reviewed on appeal
8opinions authored
46panels sat on (not as author)
—2 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
reversed 2 affirmed 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
By year: 2025 2 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- United States v. Don'tmix
- Smith v. City of Medford
- Augustine v. Talking Rain Beverage Co.
- G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Gonzalez Ruiz
- TDY Holdings, LLC v. United States
- Mcgovern v. U.S. Bank N.A.
- Guzman v. Berryhill
- U.S. Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n v. PC Iron, Inc.
- United States v. George Deputee
- Skyline Wesleyan Church v. Cal. Dep't of Managed Health Care
- Mohammed Khan v. Jefferson Sessions
- Esperanza Corral v. Select Portfolio Servicing
- Kanika Revels v. Nancy Berryhill
- Ramser v. Laielli
- Mirasol Reyes v. Checksmart Financial
- Luis Demelo v. Nancy Berryhill
- Stella Weiskopf v. Nancy Berryhill
- Sixty-Three Strategic Investment Funds v. United States
- Twenty-Two Strategic Investment Funds v. United States
- Jesus Payan v. Jefferson Sessions
- Raul Avendano Pena v. Jefferson Sessions
- United States v. Acacia Corporate Management, LLC
- Stevenson v. Aetna Health of California, Inc.
- West View Research, LLC v. Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
- Jose Jimenez v. Loretta E. Lynch