Andrew G. Schopler
, District Court, S.D. California 2016–
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 12 vacated 1 dismissed 1
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 10 remanded 1 dismissed 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
By year: 2025 12 · 2026 2 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Misner v. C R Bard Inc
- Chromy v. C R Bard Inc
- Hunter v. Saul
- Brooks v. Berryhill
- Goodlett v. Delgado
- Loera v. Saul
- Mitchell v. Silva
- Mitchell v. Silva
- Reynolds v. San Diego, County of
- Pereira v. Saul
- Denman v. Saul
- Yablonsky v. California Department of Correction & Rehabilitation
- Garcia v. Saul
- Stark v. ABC, Inc
- Kevin Tyrone Flemings v. Covello
- Bartlett v. BP West Coast Products LLC
- Persian Gulf Inc. v. BP West Coast Products LLC
- Mann v. San Diego, County of
- Kamal v. Eden Creamery, LLC
- Kamal v. Eden Creamery, LLC
- Jones v. Madden
- Rademaker v. Juarez
- Rademaker v. Juarez
- Dragasits v. Rucker
- Deruyver v. Omni La Costa Resort & Spa, LLC