Andrew G. Schopler
, District Court, S.D. California 2016–
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 12 vacated 1 dismissed 1
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 10 remanded 1 dismissed 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
By year: 2025 12 · 2026 2 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Spangler v. San Diego Family Housing, LLC
- Spangler v. San Diego Family Housing, LLC
- Alhawari v. Kijakazi
- Spivey v. Kijakazi
- Hunter v. Saul
- NeSmith v. County of San Diego
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 70.95.123.32
- Moore v. Saul
- Byrne v. Saul
- Pereira v. Saul
- Vuz v. DCSS III, Inc.
- Benavidez v. County of San Diego
- Wagner Aeronautical, Inc. v. Dotzenroth
- Goodlow v. Camacho
- Wagner Aeronautical, Inc. v. Dotzenroth
- Shufeldt v. Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C.
- Green v. Kijakazi
- Springs v. Raber
- Moody v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
- Bahrambeygui v. Robertson
- Dragasits v. Rucker
- In re subpoenas to Maxlinear, Inc.
- Jacobo v. Hernandez
- Dragasits v. Rucker