Andrew G. Schopler
, District Court, S.D. California 2016–
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 12 vacated 1 dismissed 1
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 10 remanded 1 dismissed 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
By year: 2025 12 · 2026 2 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Smith v. Saul
- Beltran v. United States of America
- Sardina v. Kijakazki
- Jimenez v. San Diego Family Housing, LLC
- Resnik v. Kijakazi
- Navarro v. Allison
- Yablonsky v. California Department of Correction & Rehabilitation
- Caballero v. San Diego Family Housing, LLC
- Munoz v. Saul
- Yablonsky v. California Department of Correction & Rehabilitation
- Wagner Aeronautical, Inc. v. Dotzenroth
- Barrett v. Kijakazi
- Jenkins v. Johnson
- Vaught IV v. Allison
- Yeargan v. Kijakazi
- Dragasits v. Rucker
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
- Hurtado v. Madden
- Truong v. Saul
- Reynolds v. Kijakazi
- Coset v. Allison
- Lopez v. San Diego Family Housing, LLC
- Ambrose v. Kijakazi
- Turner v. Kijakazi
- Nunez v. Gamboa