Andrew G. Schopler
, District Court, S.D. California 2016–
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 12 vacated 1 dismissed 1
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 10 remanded 1 dismissed 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
By year: 2025 12 · 2026 2 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Vashisht-Rota v. Ottawa University
- Sharikov v. Mayorkas
- Holt v. Simmons
- Emert v. Schuck
- Bonilla v. San Diego County Superior Court
- Campos v. Kijakazi
- Williams v. Allison
- Al Otro Lado, Inc. v. Mayorkas
- K2 Insurance Services, LLC v. King
- Cripe v. Tuggle
- Vashisht-Rota v. Ottawa University
- Open Book Theatre Company v. Brown Paper Tickets, LLC
- Medlink Health Solutions, LLC v. Maddox Defense, Inc.
- Jones v. Barrett
- Bockelmann v. Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
- Airhawk International LLC v. Air Seat Innovations LLC
- Hanson v. Theranest, LLC
- Residential Energy Services Network, Inc. v. Building Science Institute, Ltd. Co.
- Vashisht-Rota v. Utah Attorney General
- Bate v. Securly, Inc.
- 3D Systems, Inc. v. Wynne
- 3D Systems, Inc. v. Wynne
- Emert v. Schuck
- Gonzales v. Madden
- Krause-Pettai v. Unilever United States, Inc.