Andrew G. Schopler
, District Court, S.D. California 2016–
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 12 vacated 1 dismissed 1
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 10 remanded 1 dismissed 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
By year: 2025 12 · 2026 2 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Bonilla v. San Diego County Court Clerk's Office
- Hearn v. Warden
- Cabada v. Donovan State Prison
- Price v. San Diego Police Department
- Ndizeye v. Caietti
- Martinez v. Ford Motor Company
- Marnes v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
- Yuksel v. Ventyx Biosciences, Inc.
- Loera v. Saul
- Plunkett v. San Diego Post Office
- Dragasits v. Archuleta
- Ewing v. DME Capital, LLC
- Price v. San Diego Police Department
- Vashisht-Rota v. Utah Attorney General
- Vashisht-Rota v. Ottawa University
- Sharikov v. Mayorkas
- Holt v. Simmons
- Emert v. Schuck
- Bonilla v. San Diego County Superior Court
- Campos v. Kijakazi
- Williams v. Allison
- Al Otro Lado, Inc. v. Mayorkas
- K2 Insurance Services, LLC v. King
- Cripe v. Tuggle
- Vashisht-Rota v. Ottawa University