Brown v. Gore
- Proceeding
- district
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Michael M. Anello (author)
Analysis
Plaintiff, a pro se prisoner, filed a civil rights complaint and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) but failed to attach the required certified copy of his trust fund account statement. The court denied the IFP motion and dismissed the action without prejudice, granting the plaintiff 45 days to re-file with the proper documentation or pay the full filing fee.
| What the court decided | The model |
|---|---|
Denial of Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis“For this reason, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP” | agree with court The court correctly applied 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2), which mandates that a prisoner seeking IFP status must submit a certified copy of their trust fund account statement for the preceding six months. Because the plaintiff failed to provide this document, the court could not assess the required initial payment under § 1915(b)(1). Denying the motion is the standard procedural response to a deficient IFP application. |
Dismissal of Civil Action Without Prejudice“DISMISSES this action without prejudice for failure to prepay the $402 civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a).” | agree with court Under 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), a civil action must be accompanied by the filing fee unless the plaintiff is granted IFP status. Since the IFP motion was denied due to the missing trust account statement, the action lacked the requisite fee. Dismissal without prejudice is appropriate to allow the plaintiff to cure the defect by either paying the fee or filing a compliant IFP motion. |
Grant of 45 Days to Cure Defect“The Court GRANTS Plaintiff forty-five (45) days from the date this Order in which to re-open his case by either: (a) prepaying the entire civil filing and administrative fee in one lump-sum; or (b) filing a renewed Motion to Proceed IFP...” | agree with court Providing a specific timeframe to cure a procedural deficiency in a pro se prisoner case is consistent with judicial discretion and the goal of access to the courts. It allows the plaintiff to obtain the necessary documentation from the detention facility. |
The order itself: sound — The order is procedurally sound. It correctly identifies the statutory requirement for a certified trust account statement under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) and the local rule. It logically concludes that without this document, the court cannot assess the initial payment required by § 1915(b)(1), thereby necessitating the denial of the IFP motion and dismissal of the action for lack of fee. The remedy of dismissal without prejudice with a time to cure is appropriate for a pro se litigant.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DOUGLAS WAYNE BROWN, Case No.: 22-cv-348-MMA (WVG) Booking No. 21148122, 12 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO Plaintiff, 13 PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS v. AND DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION 14 WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR WILLIAM D. GORE. San Diego County 15 FAILURE TO PREPAY FILING FEES Sheriff, 16 Defendant. [Doc. No. 2] 17 18 19 Plaintiff Douglas Wayne Brown, currently housed at the South Bay Detention 20 Facility located in Chula Vista, California, and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights 21 complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. No. 1 (“Compl.”). Plaintiff did not pay 22 the filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) to commence a civil action; instead, he 23 filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 24 Doc. No. 2. 25 All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the 26 United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of 27 28 1 $402. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). The action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to 2 prepay the entire fee only if he is granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 3 § 1915(a). See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007); Rodriguez 4 v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). However, a prisoner granted leave to 5 proceed IFP remains obligated to pay the entire fee in “increments” or “installments,” 6 Bruce v. Samuels, 577 U.S. 82, 83–84 (2016); Williams v. Paramo, 775 F.3d 1182, 1185 7 (9th Cir. 2015), and regardless of whether his action is ultimately dismissed. See 28 8 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) & (2); Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 847 (9th Cir. 2002). 9 Section 1915(a)(2) requires prisoners seeking leave to proceed IFP to submit a 10 “certified copy of the trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for . . . the 11 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.” 28 U.S.C. 12 § 1915(a)(2); Andrews v. King, 398 F.3d 1113, 1119 (9th Cir. 2005). From the certified 13 trust account statement, the Court assesses an initial payment of 20% of (a) the average 14 monthly deposits in the account for the past six months, or (b) the average monthly 15 balance in the account for the past six months, whichever is greater, unless the prisoner 16 has no assets. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(4). The institution 17 having custody of the prisoner then collects subsequent payments, assessed at 20% of the 18 preceding month’s income, in any month in which his account exceeds $10, and forwards 19 those payments to the Court until the entire filing fee is paid. See 28 U.S.C. 20 § 1915(b)(2); Bruce, 577 U.S. at 84‒85. 21 While Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed IFP, he has not attached a certified copy of 22 his Inmate Statement Report for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of 23 his Complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); S.D. Cal. CivLR 3.2. Section 1915(a)(2) 24 clearly requires that prisoners “seeking to bring a civil action . . . without prepayment of 25 26 1 In addition to the $350 statutory fee, civil litigants must pay an additional administrative fee of $52. 27 See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees, District Court Misc. Fee Schedule, § 14) (eff. Dec. 1, 2020). The additional $52 administrative fee does not apply to persons granted leave 28 1 || fees ... shall submit a certified copy of the trust fund account statement (or institutional 2 ||equivalent) ... for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the 3 complaint.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) (emphasis added). Without these certified trust 4 account statements, the Court is unable to assess the appropriate amount of the initial 5 || filing fee which may be statutorily required to initiate the prosecution of this case. See 28 6 |/U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). 7 CONCLUSION 8 For this reason, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP and 9 || DISMISSES this action without prejudice for failure to prepay the $402 civil filing fee 10 required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a). The Court GRANTS Plaintiff forty-five (45) days 11 || from the date this Order in which to re-open his case by either: (a) prepaying the entire 12 civil filing and administrative fee in one lump-sum; or (b) filing a renewed Motion 13 ||to Proceed IFP, which includes a prison certificate, signed by a trust accounting 14 || official attesting as to his trust account balances and deposits and/or a certified copy 15 || of his Inmate Statement Report for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his 16 ||Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) and S.D. Cal. CivLR 3.2(b). 17 The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to provide Plaintiff with a Court- 18 || approved form “Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed In Forma 19 || Pauperis” for his use and convenience. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated: March 23, 2022 22 BWMiiduh UM -/ hipltr 23 HON. MICHAEL M. ANELLO 24 United States District Judge 25 26 27 28
Cites, in this corpus
- Lonnie Williams, Jr. v. Daniel Paramo 13-56004 · 2015-01-07