J. J. v. City of San Diego
- Area
- civil
- Appeal from
- J.K.J. v. City of San Diego (2019-11-26); J.K.J. v. City of San Diego (2020-02-13); J.K.J. v. City of San Diego (2020-05-18) — the district court's orders on this docket in the record
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 17 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT J. K. J., individually, and successor in No. 20-55622 interest to the Deceased Aleah Jenkins, by by and through his guardian-ad-litem Jeremy D.C. No. Hillyer, 3:19-cv-02123-CAB-RBB Southern District of California, Plaintiff-Appellant, San Diego v. ORDER CITY OF SAN DIEGO, a public entity; DAVID NISLET, in his individual capacity and official capacity as Police Chief of the San Diego Police Department; LAWRENCE DURBIN, an individual; JASON TAUB, an individual; DOES, 1-10, Inclusive, Defendants-Appellees, and
NICHOLAS CASICOLA,
Defendant.
MURGUIA, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)
and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.