Coffey v. United States
Richard E. COFFEY and Mildred M. Coffey v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendants-Appellees Richard E. COFFEY and Mildred M. Coffey v. UNITED STATES of America v. The ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO.
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
The facts of the case may be found in the decision of the district court in Coffey v. United States (D.C.S.D.Cal., 1971) 324 F.Supp. 1087. It is clear that Coffey was acting incident to military service.
The order of the district court granting a motion for summary judgment in behalf of the United States, appellee, is affirmed on the authority of Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135, 71 S.Ct. 153, 95 L.Ed. 152 (1950).
Cites, in this corpus
- Coffey v. United States Civ. 69-1-K · 1971-04-12
Cited by
- Schoenfeld v. Quamme 05-55126 · 2007-07-02