Taliaferro v. Wampler

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 15486 · 1953-06-09 · Published · 118 Cal. App. 2d 391 · 257 P.2d 674 · 1953 Cal. App. LEXIS 1565

E. A. TALIAFERRO v. ERNEST WAMPLER

Area: civil
Panel: Maurice T. Dooling, Jr. (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Dooling

DOOLING, J.

Plaintiff has attempted to appeal from a minute order and a written order subsequently signed by the trial judge sustaining a demurrer to his second amended complaint without leave to amend. No judgment appears in the record and since no appeal lies from an order sustaining demurrer the appeal must be dismissed. (Cole v. Rush, 40 Cal.2d 178 [252 P.2d 1].)

Appeal dismissed.

Nourse, P. J., and McComb, J. assigned, concurred.

Cites, in this corpus

Cole v. Rush L. A. No. 22358 · 1953-01-20

Cited by

A. L. Castle, Inc. v. County of San Benito Civ. 21192 · 1964-06-03
Smith v. Smith Civ. 16000 · 1954-06-23