Cole v. Rush
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
40 Cal.2d 178 (1953) DOROTHEA COLE et al., Appellants, v. PAUL RUSH et al., Defendants; FRANK VAN STONE, Respondent.
L. A. No. 22358. Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
Jan. 20, 1953. John C. Stevenson and Lionel Richman for Appellants.
Parker, Stanbury, Reese & McGee and A. P. G. Steffes for Respondent.
THE COURT.
[1] This is an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend. Such an order is nonappealable (Evans v. Dabney (1951), 37 Cal.2d 758, 759 [235 P.2d 604], and authorities there cited; 3 Cal.Jur.2d 476), and this court must, therefore, dismiss the appeal of its own motion. (Collins v. Corse (1936), 8 Cal.2d 123, 124 [64 P.2d 137]; Estate of Brady (1948), 32 Cal.2d 478, 480 [196 P.2d 881]; Rosenberg v. Knesboro (1947), 80 Cal.App.2d 36, 38 [180 P.2d 750]; see, also, 4 Cal.Jur.2d 337, and cases there cited.)
The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.
Cites, in this corpus
- Evans v. Dabney L. A. 21940 · 1951-09-26
- Estate of Brady S. F. 17553 · 1948-08-30
- Rosenberg v. Knesboro Civ. 15373 · 1947-05-27
- Collins v. Corse S. F. 15476 · 1936-12-31
Cited by
- Fregoso v. Eat Club CA6 H046724 · 2020-09-16
- Katzenstein v. Chabad of Poway D066340 · 2015-06-15
- Ricard v. Grobstein, Goldman, Stevenson, Siegel, LeVine & Mangel B058074 · 1992-05-11
- Zappas v. King Williams Press, Inc. Civ. 34803 · 1970-08-24
- Daar v. Yellow Cab Co. L. A. 29439 · 1967-11-15
- Custodio v. Bauer Civ. 23003 · 1967-05-24
- People Ex Rel. Dep't of Pub. Works v. Clausen Docket Nos. 22789, 23142 · 1967-02-27
- Galanis v. Mercury Internat. Ins. Underwriters Civ. 23262 · 1967-01-12
- Bledsoe v. Informative Research Civ. No. 30002 · 1967-01-11
- Russ v. Stiller Civ. No. 393 · 1965-01-28
- Hohn v. Hohn Civ. 27974 · 1964-08-21
- West v. Cranmer Civ. 7208 · 1963-09-16
- Curnutt v. Holk Civ. 25473 · 1962-04-26
- Brown v. Mayor and City Council Civ. No. 5751 · 1959-10-27
- Brown v. Mayor of Redlands Civ. No. 5751 · 1959-10-27
- Carley v. City of Santa Rosa Civ. 9208 · 1957-10-04
- Lavine v. Jessup L. A. 24143 · 1957-05-28
- Futlick v. F. W. Woolworth Co. Civ. 5361 · 1957-03-19
- Rupley v. Winkler Civ. No. 8913 · 1956-12-21
- Berri v. Superior Court S. F. 19059 · 1955-01-28
- Taliaferro v. Wampler Civ. No. 15486 · 1953-06-09