Lay v. Pacific Perforating Co.

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 3121 · 1944-03-23 · Published · 63 Cal. App. 2d 452 · 146 P.2d 923 · 1944 Cal. App. LEXIS 963

WILETTA LAY v. PACIFIC PERFORATING COMPANY, LTD., (a Corporation)

Area: civil
Panel: Lloyd E. Griffin (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Griffin

GRIFFIN, J.

A petition for writ of supersedeas was filed by defendants and appellants pending the appeal in the above entitled case. An order to show cause was issued and pending the hearing thereof all proceedings on the judgment were stayed conditioned that defendants file a sufficient bond in the sum of $6828. Such a bond was filed. The appeal from the judgment was decided adversely to defendants. (Lay v. Pacific Perforating Co., Ltd,., 62 Cal.App.2d 233 [144 P.2d 395].) A hearing was subsequently denied by the Supreme Court. That judgment has become final. The question presented under the writ has become moot.

Petition dismissed.

Barnard, P. J., and Marks, J., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus

Lay v. Pacific Perforating Co. Civ. 3121 · 1944-01-08

Cited by

In re Field CA4/1 D063227 · 2013-12-18