Steffey v. Standard Stations, Inc.
GRACE STEFFEY v. STANDARD STATIONS, INC. (a Corporation)
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Charles R. Barnard (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Barnard
BARNARD, P. J.
From the certificate of the county clerk on file herein it appears that notice of appeal was filed on January 21, 1933; that no bill of exceptions has been filed under section 650 of the Code of Civil Procedure; that no transcript has been filed under section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure; that no request for a transcript under the provisions of section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure has been filed; that no additional time in which to prepare and serve a bill of exceptions has been allowed; that no proceeding for a bill of exceptions or a transcript is pending in the trial court; and that the time within which a record might be prepared under either method has expired. Respondents’ motion to dismiss should, therefore, be granted (General Motors etc. Co. v. Holman, 63 Cal. App. 17 [217 Pac. 1086]; People v. Berkeley Chiropractic College, 103 Cal. App. 139 [283 Pac. 981] ; Union Trust Co. of San Diego v. Novotny, 125 Cal. App. 417 [13 Pac. (2d) 974]).
The appeal is dismissed.
Marks, J., and Jennings, J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- Union Trust Co. v. Novotny Docket No. 1036. · 1932-08-20
- Union Trust Co. v. Novotny Docket No. 1035. · 1932-08-20
- People v. Berkeley Chiropractic College Docket No. 7187. · 1930-01-10
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Holman Civ. No. 4708. · 1923-07-16