gno.law

Union Trust Co. v. Novotny

California Court of Appeal · Docket No. 1036. · 1932-08-20 · Published · 13 P.2d 974 · 125 Cal. App. 418

UNION TRUST COMPANY OF SAN DIEGO (A Corporation), Respondent, v. C. J. NOVOTNY, Appellant

Area
civil
Panel
Jennings (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Jennings

JENNINGS, J.

In support of its motion to dismiss the appeal herein for failure to file a transcript of the record within the prescribed time, respondent has filed the certificate of the county clerk as required by Bule VI of the Buies of the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal. The facts set forth in such certificate are uncontradicted *419 and it therefrom appears that notice of appeal was filed on October 13, 1931, and that neither a hill of exceptions has been settled as provided by section 650 of the Code of Civil Procedure nor has a transcript been prepared in accordance with the provisions of section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure. It further appears that the statutory period within which a record on appeal may be prepared and filed under cither method has expired. Respondent’s motion should therefore be granted (General Motors etc. Corp.

v. Holman, 63 Cal. App. 17 [217 Pac. 1086];

People v. Berkeley Chiropractic College, 103 Cal. App. 139 [283 Pac. 981]). The appeal is dismissed.

Marks, Acting P. J., and Morton, J., pro tern., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus

Cited by