gno.law

Skipitarey v. Fitts

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 7222 · 1932-12-14 · Published · 128 Cal. App. 191

LOUIS A. SKIPITAREY v. BUFF FITTS

Area
civil
Panel
Thompson, Ira

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Thompsonira

THOMPSON (IRA F.), J.

The respondents have made a motion to dismiss the appeal herein on the ground that appellants’ opening brief violates that portion of Rule *192VIII of the Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal requiring each point to be presented separately 11 under an appropriate heading, showing the nature of the question to be presented or the point to be made”. There are but two headings or titles in the brief, the one “Statement of the Case” and the other “Argument”. It is manifest that respondents’ motion is well founded. (See Barnes v. Cocke, 99 Cal. App. 700 [279 Pac. 190], Hawkins v. Doolittle, 113 Cal. App. 619 [298 Pac. 862], Withers v. Southern Pac. Co., 101 Cal. App. 373 [281 Pac. 518], and People v. Yaroslawsky, 110 Cal. App. 175 [293 Pac. 815].)

The appeal is dismissed.

Works, P. J., and Craig, J., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus