gno.law

City of Los Angeles v. Nash

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 7336 · 1931-05-18 · Published · 114 Cal. App. 758

CITY OF LOS ANGELES (a Municipal Corporation) v. HARRY B. NASH, Defendants JAMES L. CLARKE

Area
civil
Panel
Thompson, Ira

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Thompsonira

THOMPSON (IRA F.), J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to tax costs, in which all the material facts and questions of law are identical with those of City of Los Angeles v. Sadie D. Griffith Abbott, Julia Fanta, etc., et al., Respondents (No. 7369), ante, p. 180 [299 Pac. 807], this day decided. The same disposition should be made of the instant case.

Order affirmed.

Works, P. J., and Craig, J., concurred.