Eureka Casualty Co. v. Municipal Court
EUREKA CASUALTY CO. v. THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Thompson, Ira
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Thompsonira
THOMPSON (IRA F.), J.
This is a proceeding in certiorari brought for purposes identical with those in Los Angeles Surety Co. v. Municipal Court, (Civ. No. 7495) ante, p. 133 [295 Pac. 591], and upon the same state of facts except that in the present case the bond was given upon an appeal from a judgment punishing the defendant for another and different offense against the provisions of the Wright Act (Stats. 1921, p. 79). After affirmance of that judgment the defendant failed to present himself in satisfaction thereof and the bail was declared forfeited. Like proceedings were had as in the companion case just mentioned "and for the reasons stated in the *762opinion this day rendered in that case we must make like disposition of the writ heretofore issued.
Writ dismissed.
Works, P. J., and Craig, J., concurred.
A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on February 14, 1931.
Cites, in this corpus
- Los Angeles Surety Co. v. Municipal Court Docket No. 7495. · 1931-01-16