Goldberg v. Van Noy
ANN GOLDBERG v. A. VAN NOY
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Thompson (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Thompson
THOMPSON (R. L.), J.
This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff in an action in ejectment.
This case was tried and determined on the same evidence which was presented in the ease of A. Van Noy et al. v. Ann Goldberg et al., in which an opinion of this court was rendered and filed this day (see ante, p. 604 [277 Pac. 538]), and upon the determination of which this appeal depends. Both appeals affect the same real property. In that case a judgment upholding the validity of the foreclosure proceedings and the conveyance of the property to this respondent, Ann Goldherg, was affirmed. No new issues are raised on this appeal. It follows that this respondent is entitled to the possession of the property, together with damages awarded for the unlawful detention thereof.
Upon the authority of A. Van Noy et al. v. Ann Goldberg et al., supra, the judgment in this case is affirmed.
Plummer, J., and Finch, P. J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- Van Noy v. Goldberg Docket No. 3753. · 1929-04-30