gno.law

In re Staley

California Court of Appeal · Crim. No. 1466 · 1927-01-07 · Published · 80 Cal. App. 589

In the Matter of the Application of JOHN E. STALEY, on Behalf of WALLENTZ CRANICZNY, for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

Area
other

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

THE COURT.

This application is not materially different from Criminal No. 1464, wherein C. A. Stice made a similar application on behalf of Craniczny. The additional matters set forth in the petition herein could not be proved without referring to the evidence received in the trial before the recorder’s court. But such evidence may not be considered in this proceeding. (In re Kaster, 52 Cal. App. 454 [198 Pac. 1029]; In re Kaster, 185 Cal. 647 [198 Pac. 1031].) The application for a writ is denied.

Cites, in this corpus