In Re Kaster
In the Matter of the Application of Edward M. Kaster for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.
- Outcome
- writ denied — APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus to release petitioner from custody after conviction of violation of the Motor Vehicle Act. Writ denied.
- Area
- other
- Panel
- The Court (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The petitioner heretofore sought his discharge on habeascorpus on account of the matters alleged in his petition filed herein, at the hands of the district court of appeal of the third appellate district. After a hearing that court on May 2, 1921, discharged the writ and remanded the petitioner. The court in so doing filed a written opinion. (In re Kaster onHabeas Corpus, No. 556, filed May 2, 1921 (Cal.App.),198 P. 1029.) [1] All points available to petitioner on habeas corpus are considered in that opinion, which, to our minds, correctly states the law in regard thereto.
The application for a writ is denied.
All the Justices concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- In Re Kaster Crim. No. 556. · 1921-05-02
Cited by
- In Re Meisner Crim. 375 · 1939-01-07
- In Re Hartman Crim. 4099 · 1937-09-21
- In Re Application of Luna Docket No. Crim. 2999. · 1927-06-17
- People v. Denault Docket Nos. 1382, 1460. · 1927-01-24
- In Re Application of Staley Docket No. 1466. · 1927-01-07
- In re Staley Crim. No. 1466 · 1927-01-07
- In Re Hayward Crim. No. 1127. · 1923-05-10
- In Re Braynard Crim. No. 561. · 1921-05-13