Ritter v. Mason
RITTER v. MASON
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Stephen J. Field (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Field
Field, J., at the April Term, 1858, delivered the opinion of the Court Terry, C. J., and Burnett, J., concurring.
The stipulations inserted in the transcript are not embodied in any statement or bill of exceptions, and form, therefore, no part of the record; and there is no certificate of the Judge or Clerk, or any admission of counsel, that the affidavits constitute the papers used on the motion to open the judgment. There is left for our consideration only the judgment roll, which discloses no error. Practice Act, section 346; Newland v. Kean, and Davis v. Stratton, January Term, 1856 ; Tates v. Buckingham, 4 Cal. 286.
Judgment affirmed.
Cites, in this corpus
- Gates v. Buckingham · 1854-07-15