Gates v. Buckingham
MARY E. GATES v. CHARLES E. BUCKINGHAM
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- William J. Murray, Jr. (author), Heydeneeldt
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Murray
Mr. Ch. J. Murray delivered the opinion of the Court.
Mr. J. Heydeneeldt concurred.
*287This appeal is presented from an order of the Court below re-taxing costs.
The record contains various notices and affidavits, which are not, however, embodied in a bill of exceptions or statement, so that we are uninformed upon what the Court acted. The judgment must, therefore, be affirmed, on the presumption that the Court below decided correctly upon all the evidence before it.
Cited by
- Wilmon v. Aros L. A. No. 7292. · 1923-04-25
- Ritter v. Mason · 1858-07-01