People v. Flacco
The People v. Stefano Flacco
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of San Joaquin County
- Trial judge
- D. M. Young
- Outcome
- other — The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- The Court. — (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
There has been no appearance in this court for appellant. An examination of the record thoroughly convinces us that he was fairly tried and justly convicted.
The judgment and order are, therefore, affirmed.
Cited by
- Franchise Tax Board v. Superior Court S176943 · 2011-06-06
- Sonleitner v. Superior Court Civ. 22927 · 1958-03-06
- Assets Reconstruction Corp. v. Munson Civ. 15651 · 1947-09-02
- Mercury Herald Co. v. Moore S. F. 16809 · 1943-06-01
- People v. Hochwender L. A. 17816 · 1942-04-20
- Southern Service Co. v. County of Los Angeles L. A. 16598 · 1940-01-02
- Marculescu v. City Planning Commission Civ. 9504 · 1935-06-04
- Cooper v. Gibson Docket No. 4952. · 1933-07-31
- Hershey v. Cole Docket No. 4817. · 1933-03-29
- General Engineering & Dry Dock Co. v. East Bay Municipal Utility District Docket No. 8531. · 1932-09-27
- La Mesa, Lemon Grove & Spring Valley Irrigation District v. Halley Docket No. S.F. 11502. · 1925-09-14
- Krohn v. Reclamation District No. 17 Civ. No. 1856. · 1918-06-27
- Krohn v. Reclamation District No. 17 Civ. No. 1856 · 1918-06-27