Krohn v. Reclamation District No. 17
Henry Krohn v. Reclamation District No. 17
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of San Joaquin County
- Trial judge
- John Hancock
- Outcome
- other — Presiding. The facts are similar to those stated in Spurrier et al. v.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Albert G. Burnett (author), —
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
This action was brought to prevent the sale of the property of plaintiffs to enforce the lien of a reclamation tax and is a companion case to Spurrier v. Neumiller, etc., ante, p. 683, [174 P. 338]. It is conceded that the decisive question is the same in the two appeals, and that is, whether the land should be credited with the payment of said invalid assessment. Having reached the conclusion that the lower court was correct in holding that no such credit should be given, it follows that we should affirm the judgment in this case, and it is so ordered.
Chipman, P. J., and Hart, J., concurred.
A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on August 26, 1918.
*Page 1
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Flacco Crim. No. 441. · 1918-06-27