Stewart v. Marple
Arthur R. Stewart v. Walker F. Marple
- Outcome
- dismissed — MOTION to dismiss appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. F.A. Leonard, Judge. Motion granted and appeal dismissed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Marks (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
This is a motion to dismiss this appeal. [1] It appears from the certificate of the clerk of the court below that no proceedings are pending for a settlement of a bill of exceptions or a transcript on appeal and that no notice for the preparation of a transcript under the provisions of section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure has been filed in his office. The statutory time within which a record on appeal may be prepared and filed under either method of appeal in this state has expired. Upon the authority of Union Trust Co. v. Novotny, 125 Cal.App. 417, 418 [13 P.2d 974], the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
Barnard, P.J., and Jennings, J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- Union Trust Co. v. Novotny Docket No. 1036. · 1932-08-20
- Union Trust Co. v. Novotny Docket No. 1035. · 1932-08-20
Cited by
- Studebaker v. Bower Civ. No. 2478 · 1940-03-15
- Rees v. Roberts Civ. 2149 · 1937-12-15
- Bales v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Co. Civ. No. 1174 · 1934-12-12
- Bales v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Civ. No. 1174 · 1934-12-12