G.S. Donaldson Inv. Co. v. Shay
G.S. Donaldson Investment Co. (A Corporation) v. W.A. Shay
- Outcome
- dismissed — MOTION to dismiss appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Benjamin F. Warmer, Judge. Appeal dismissed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Thompson (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
This is a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the notice of appeal was filed too late. It is submitted to us upon the motion and brief of respondent only, the appellant having failed to file any reply.
[1] From the certificate of the county clerk it appears that the judgment appealed from was entered on July 15, 1926, and that the notice of appeal was filed on April 9, 1927, and more than sixty days after the entry of judgment. No proceedings for a new trial were begun. Section 939 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides that "An appeal may be taken from any judgment . . . within sixty days from the entry of said judgment." It has been uniformly held that the appeal must be taken within the time prescribed by law, otherwise the appellate court is without *Page 764 jurisdiction to entertain it. (Lancel v. Postlethwaite,172 Cal. 326 [156 P. 486].)
Appeal dismissed.
Works, P.J., and Craig, J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- Lancel v. Postlethwaite S. F. No. 7725. In Bank. · 1916-03-16
Cited by
- Bley v. Board of Dental Examiners Docket No. 3884. · 1929-11-04