Bullock v. Bullock
Joseph J. Bullock v. May E. Bullock
- Proceeding
- appeal from an order
- Trial court
- Superior Court of San Mateo County
- Trial judge
- George H. Buck
- Outcome
- other — The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Albert G. Burnett (author), —
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
Appellant filed her brief in the supreme court on the thirty-first day of August, 1914. The cause was thereafter transferred to this court and came on regularly for hearing on the nineteenth day of this month. Respondent has never filed any brief, either in the supreme or this court nor did he appear at the oral argument. He was regularly served with notice that on said nineteenth day of January, 1916, appellant would move this court "for an order reversing the order appealed from without consideration of the cause upon its merits . . . upon the ground that respondent has not filed his points and authorities herein." As stated, there was no appearance by respondent. *Page 464 The order appealed from is therefore reversed on the authority of Richter v. Fresno Canal Irr. Co., 101 Cal. 582, [36 P. 96]; Davis v. Hart, 103 Cal. 530, [37 P. 486]; Kelly v. Bradbury, 104 Cal. 237, [37 P. 872].
Chipman, P. J., and Hart, J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- Kelly v. Bradbury No. 15554 · 1894-09-28
- Davis v. Hart No. 19401 · 1894-08-13
- Richter v. Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co. No. 18238 · 1894-03-13
Cited by
- Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank v. Scott Civ. No. 26799 · 1963-12-02
- Duisenberg-Wichman & Co. v. Johnson Docket No. 7200. · 1932-01-27
- Lutz v. Merchants Nat. Bank L. A. No. 4490. · 1918-12-13