Davis v. Hart
ALFRED A. DAVIS v. JOSIAH H. HART
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Robert R. Fitzgerald (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Fitzgerald
Fitzgerald, J.
There is no brief on file by respondent, nor was the case orally argued in his behalf. ■ As the record shows that the findings are attacked by the specifications on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to support them, it follows on the authority of Richter v. Fresno Canal etc. Co., 101 Cal. 582, that the judgment and order appealed from should be reversed.
So ordered.
McFarland, J., and De Haven, J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- Richter v. Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co. No. 18238 · 1894-03-13
Cited by
- Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank v. Scott Civ. No. 26799 · 1963-12-02
- Duisenberg-Wichman & Co. v. Johnson Docket No. 7200. · 1932-01-27
- Lutz v. Merchants Nat. Bank L. A. No. 4490. · 1918-12-13
- Bullock v. Bullock Civ. No. 1480. · 1916-01-24
- Bullock v. Bullock Civ. No. 1480 · 1916-01-24
- Contra Costa Water Co. v. Breed S.F. No. 3123. · 1903-06-23
- Kelly v. Bradbury No. 15554 · 1894-09-28