Beazell v. Schrader
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Louis H. Burke (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
205 Cal.App.2d 673 (1962) HOWARD L. BEAZELL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. EUGENE SCHRADER, Defendant and Respondent.
Civ. No. 26165. California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Four.
July 16, 1962. Milton Zerin for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Thomas E. Garcin for Defendant and Respondent.
BURKE, P. J.
Plaintiff purports to appeal from an order sustaining without leave to amend defendant's demurrer to a first amended complaint.
On November 3, 1961, a minute order was entered sustaining defendant's demurrer to first amended complaint without leave to amend for failure to state a cause of action within the jurisdiction of the superior court. No judgment thereon has been entered. *674 [1] It is well settled that an order sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend is not an appealable order or a final judgment. A reviewing court does not have jurisdiction to review an appeal of this type. (Tellefsen v. Key System Transit Lines, 187 Cal.App.2d 44 [9 Cal.Rptr. 299]; Futlick v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 149 Cal.App.2d 296, 298 [308 P.2d 405]; Schmidt v. Townsend, 103 Cal.App.2d 185, 186-187 [229 P.2d 488]; see also 3 Witkin, Cal. Procedure, 19, p. 2162.)
The purported appeal is dismissed.
Jefferson, J., and Balthis, J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- Tellefsen v. Key System Transit Lines Civ. No. 18797 · 1960-12-02
- Tellefsen v. Key System Transit Lines Civ. No. 18797 · 1960-12-02
- Futlick v. F. W. Woolworth Co. Civ. 5361 · 1957-03-19
- Schmidt v. Townsend Civ. 14741 · 1951-03-29
Cited by
- Taylor v. Broomfield CA3 C099288 · 2024-09-05
- Webtoon Entertainment v. Rocketship Entertainment CA2/3 B319331 · 2024-02-28
- Saunders v. American Home Mortgage Servicing CA3 C069145 · 2013-07-30
- Modica v. Merin C010107 · 1991-09-27
- Supple v. City of Los Angeles B029166 · 1988-06-02
- Holland v. Thacher A036062 · 1988-03-23
- Sher v. Leiderman H000859 · 1986-05-29
- Battle v. Kessler Civ. 69759 · 1983-12-13
- Munoz v. Davis Civ. 66464 · 1983-03-28
- Molien v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals S.F. 24084 · 1980-08-25
- Youngblood v. Board of Supervisors Docket Nos. L.A. 30868, 30869 · 1978-11-20
- Vanoni v. County of Sonoma Civ. 33623 · 1974-07-19
- California State Employees' Ass'n v. Flournoy Civ. 40554 · 1973-05-09
- California State Employees'assn. v. St. of Calif. Civ. 13670 · 1973-05-04
- Covarrubias v. James Civ. 28760 · 1971-11-15
- Gosney v. State of California Civ. 34639 · 1970-08-28
- Bledsoe v. Informative Research Civ. No. 30002 · 1967-01-11
- Herrick v. Everhart Civ. No. 28375 · 1966-03-29
- Vibert v. Berger L. A. 28498 · 1966-02-02
- Norkin v. United States Fire Insurance Civ. 27189 · 1963-08-13
- Beazell v. Schrader L. A. 27195 · 1963-05-14