Security First National Bank v. Denton

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 1767 · 1936-02-13 · Published · 11 Cal. App. 2d 707 · 54 P.2d 504

Area: civil

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

11 Cal.App.2d 707 (1936) SECURITY FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES (a National Banking Corporation), as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. MILDRED B. DENTON et al., Defendants; MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY (a Corporation) et al., Appellants.

Civ. No. 1767. California Court of Appeals. Fourth Appellate District.

February 13, 1936. John Ralph Wilson and McKinstry, Haber & Coombes for Appellants.

William C. Crossland for Respondent.

The Court.

[1] The respondent herein has confessed error in the record and all parties have stipulated that the judgment may be reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings and that the remittitur be issued forthwith.

The errors pointed out appear to be material, prejudicial and sufficient to justify a reversal.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings, the remittitur to issue forthwith. *708

Cites, in this corpus

Security First National Bank v. Denton Civ. No. 1767 · 1936-02-13