gno.law

Esquivel v. Raney

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 18200 · 1951-08-17 · Published · 106 Cal. App. 2d 162 · 234 P.2d 62

Area
civil
Panel
Vallee (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

106 Cal.App.2d 162 (1951) JESS ESQUIVEL et al., Appellants, v. DR. RUPERT B. RANEY, Respondent.

Civ. No. 18200. California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Three.

Aug. 17, 1951. Orloff & Pollack and Ruthe Jacobson for Appellants.

Ralph N. Highsmith and Henry E. Kappler for Respondent. *163 VALLEE, J.

Plaintiffs appealed from an order setting aside the entry of the default of defendant Rupert B. Raney. No judgment has been entered in the action.

[1] Section 963 of the Code of Civil Procedure enumerates the various orders from which appeals may be taken. An order setting aside a default before judgment is entered is not one of the orders enumerated. It is therefore not appealable. (See cases cited in 5 West's Cal.Dig. (1951) Appeal and Error, 152, 113(3).)

Appeal dismissed.

Shinn, P. J., and Wood (Parker), J., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus

Cited by