gno.law

Santa Barbara Lodge No. 605 v. Penzner

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 18261 · 1951-05-29 · Published · 104 Cal. App. 2d 494 · 231 P.2d 595

Area
civil
Panel
Emmet H. Wilson (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

104 Cal.App.2d 494 (1951) SANTA BARBARA LODGE NO. 605, LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE (a Corporation), Appellant, v. WILLIAM L. PENZNER, Respondent.

Civ. No. 18261. California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Two.

May 29, 1951. McGee & De Loreto for Appellant.

Schauer, Ryon & McMahon and Guy E. Ward for Respondent.

WILSON, J.

This action was commenced in Santa Barbara County for the specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property in that county, or for damages in the event defendant should be unable to fulfill the terms of the contract.

Defendant's motion for change of venue to Los Angeles County on the ground that he is a resident of the latter county was granted and plaintiff has appealed from the order.

[1] The county in which the real property is situated is the county in which the case should be tried. (Code Civ. Proc., 392; Kopke v. Carlson, 98 Cal.App. 155, 157 [276 P. 606]; McFarland v. Martin, 144 Cal. 771, 774 [78 P. 239].)

Order reversed.

Moore, P. J., and McComb, J., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus

Cited by