Sawyer v. County of San Luis Obispo
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- William H. Langdon (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
4 Cal.2d 776 (1935) D. F. SAWYER, Petitioner, v. COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO (a Public Corporation) et al., Respondents.
L. A. No. 15178. Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
August 16, 1935. Robert H. Dunlap and George R. Larwill for Petitioner.
M. R. Van Wormer, District Attorney, for Respondents.
Memorandum LANGDON, J.
[1] This petition for a writ of mandate presents a situation practically identical with that involved in the case of Southern California Roads Co. v. County of San Luis Obispo, L. A. No. 15142 (ante, p. 220 [48 PaCal.2d 34]), this day decided.
For the reasons therein stated, it is ordered that a writ of mandate issue as prayed.
Seawell, J., Waste, C.J., Preston, J., and Shenk, J., concurred.
Cited by
- Union Safe Deposit Bank v. City of Clovis Civ. No. 1822 · 1937-11-06
- Kerr Glass Manufacturing Corp. v. City of San Buenaventura L. A. 15860 · 1936-11-19
- Hammond v. City of Burbank L. A. 15223 · 1936-06-30
- Thompson v. City of Compton L. A. No. 15387 · 1936-06-30
- Thompson v. City of La Mesa Civ. 1924 · 1935-10-17