gno.law

Morrison v. Yippee Entertainment, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California · 3:24-cv-00797 · 2024-11-27 · Unknown

Proceeding
district
Area
civil
On appeal
Morrison v. Yippee Entertainment, Inc. (2025-08-18) — reversed — the Ninth Circuit's later ruling on this docket
Panel
Michael M. Anello (author)

Analysis

A model's reading — qwen3.8-27b, prompt own-v1, 2026-10-13T21:18Z · confidence high

The defendant filed a notice of appeal regarding the district court's prior order denying its motion to compel arbitration. The court stayed the case pending the adjudication of that interlocutory appeal.

What the court decidedThe model
Case stayed pending adjudication of interlocutory appeal
“Pursuant to Coinbase, Inc. v. Bielski, 599 U.S. 736, 744 (2023), the Court therefore STAYS the case pending adjudication of the interlocutory appeal.”
agree with court
The decision follows directly from the Supreme Court's holding in Coinbase, Inc. v. Bielski, which mandates that a district court stay proceedings when a party files a timely notice of appeal from an order denying a motion to compel arbitration. The order correctly identifies the triggering event (the notice of appeal) and applies the required procedural consequence.

The order itself: sound — The order is procedurally correct and concise. It accurately cites the controlling Supreme Court precedent (Coinbase) that requires a stay upon the filing of a notice of appeal in an arbitration context. There are no gaps in the reasoning because the legal rule is mandatory and the factual predicate (filing of the notice) is stated.

How this analysis was made · dispute it

Opinion

I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 || BRITTANY MORRISON, individually Case No. 24-cv-0797-MMA-KSC 12 and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ORDER STAYING CASE 13 Plaintiff, 15 YIPPEE ENTERTAINMENT, INC., 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 On November 26, 2024, Defendant Yippee Entertainment, Inc., filed a notice of 20 || appeal regarding the Court’s order denying its motion to compel arbitration. 21 || Doc. No. 23. Pursuant to Coinbase, Inc. v. Bielski, 599 U.S. 736, 744 (2023), the Court 22 therefore STAYS the case pending adjudication of the interlocutory appeal. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: November 27, 2024 “ Vth ll De hipht 25 HON. MICHAEL M. ANELLO 6 United States District Judge 27 28